9 best Peec AI alternatives in 2026, compared by price, prompts and AI engines

• 3 models

  What every self-serve Peec plan checks

  Starter, Pro and Advanced each say “Choose 3 models”. Each extra one costs $35, $85 or $165 a month, depending on the plan, up to 6 (pricing, help). All 6 on Starter: $200 a month.

• Sep 2026

  Perplexity left Peec’s pick list

  Between 8 and 23 September 2026, Perplexity moved from the “choose 3” list to Enterprise and the paid add-ons; Naver AI took its place (Wayback). Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Mistral are Enterprise only.

• $95 / €85

  Two price lists, picked by your IP address

  US visitors see $95 / $245 / $495; EU visitors see €85 / €205 / €425. US and Canadian customers contract with Peec AI US Inc. and pay in dollars (pricing, terms). Yearly: $80 / $205 / $420 a month.

• 30 days

  How long your data stays after you leave

  After the subscription ends you can export for 30 days, then Peec deletes the data. Fees are “non-refundable”; yearly plans renew for 12 months unless you give 30 days’ notice (terms §4.1, §5.2, §5.5).

• 11%

  AI assistants name Peec AI more than most trackers

  In 93 AI answers to “which AI-visibility tool?” questions (our own data; a sample, not a market survey), Peec AI was named in 10. Semrush was named in 43%, Profound in 13%. Rankfender: 0.

Monthly billing, checked 28 Oct 2026 on each vendor’s own page from the US. Ratings as listed on Trustpilot and G2.

* Peec’s G2 figure is a G2 search snippet (G2 blocks automated reading); Peec’s own site shows both 4.7 and 4.9. Scrunch publishes no frequency; 5,000 answers a month across 125 prompts and 4 engines works out to about every 3 days (our calculation). ** Meteoria shows prices in euros only, without saying whether VAT is included: converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Oct 2026 (€1 = $1.1133). Qwairy’s 27-prompt figure is its own FAQ’s. Review counts in brackets; a score from 1 or 2 reviews says little. Rankfender has no Trustpilot profile yet; our G2 page is linked rather than quoted.

What Peec AI users and reviewers say (verbatim, dated)

Impressions are times one of our pages was shown in Google, not search volume. This URL is new, so we looked at every query containing “peec” across rankfender.com over 90 days (30 Jul – 28 Oct 2026, Rankfender’s own data): 15 queries, 47 impressions, 0 clicks, all long questions that read like AI agents researching for a user. Too few to steer a page, so we also read today’s US results for “peec ai alternatives”, “competitors”, “pricing” and “vs Profound / AthenaHQ / Otterly”.

• Getmint vs Peec AI

  “between getmint and peec ai… who offers better ai search innovation? which one should i choose?”

  15

  Getmint vs Peec AI

• German-language (DACH) prompts

  “als vertriebsleiter… in der dach-region… vergleiche hubspot aeo mit profound, peec ai und otterly.ai”

  13

  European markets and what users say

• Evaluations

  “where does peec ai underperform its competitors?”, “is peec ai good for… smaller european markets?”

  10

  Why people leave and the FAQ

• Spanish comparisons

  “compara scrunch con semrush ai toolkit hubspot aeo peec ai y rankscale…”

  9

  Comparison table

What the search results told us: Google’s first result is a vendor’s one-on-one page with 2025 euro prices; Google’s AI answer calls the tool “Peak AI” and gives no Peec price, and most of its lines cite a page with Peec’s old €89 / €205 / €425 prices. None of the 14 pages we read prices the 3-model cap in dollars, checks Peec’s terms, or notes that Perplexity left the base list. This page does all three.

Rankfender tracks what AI assistants answer to our customers’ questions. We took the 93 answers (8 assistants, Mar – Oct 2026) to questions asking for an AI-visibility tool or platform that named no tool themselves, and counted which tools each answer mentions. 59 of the questions are in Portuguese, 26 in English and 8 in French. It’s the same sample as on our Profound and AthenaHQ pages.

• Semrush
  43% (40)
• Ahrefs (incl. Brand Radar)
  33% (31)
• Google Search Console
  16% (15)
• HubSpot
  15% (14)
• BrightEdge
  14% (13)
• Profound
  13% (12)
• Peec AI
  11% (10)
• Writesonic
  10% (9)
• Otterly.AI
  9% (8)
• Scrunch
  8% (7)
• AthenaHQ
  5% (5)
• Rankfender
  0% (0)

What it means: even when someone asks for an AI-visibility tool, assistants name SEO suites first. Among dedicated trackers, Peec AI is second only to Profound (10 answers vs 12), ahead of Otterly.AI and Scrunch; Rankfender appears in none. 93 answers isn’t a market survey: these are the questions our customers track, mostly from one Portuguese-language project.

Peec prices by prompts × models, so we priced three real set-ups on each tool’s public plans, monthly billing, from each vendor’s page on 28 Oct 2026. Peec’s extra models are its own add-on prices. These scenarios price **monitoring only**: articles, site fixes and SEO data aren’t counted, which is why Rankfender looks expensive here.

Monthly billing in USD, before tax. Annual billing lowers most figures by 15–20% (Peec: $80 / $205 / $420 a month billed yearly). Qwairy shows its own dollar prices to US visitors (€79 / €199 / €449 in Europe, excluding VAT). Scrunch publishes no check frequency; 5,000 answers ÷ (125 prompts × 4 engines) = 10 checks a prompt a month.

Peec AI’s main features, and the closest replacement for each, checked 28 Oct 2026. In the Rankfender column, Yes means it does the job, Partial means part of it, No means it doesn’t.

We rate every tool on the same six criteria, with the same scale. We don’t add them into one total: the right tool depends on what you used Peec AI for, so after Rankfender (listed first, see the disclosure) the tools are ordered by the job they replace best. Rankfender is our product and is rated with the same rules; if daily prompts in Google’s AI answers are what you need, Peec AI itself, SE Visible or Otterly.AI will suit you better.

• AI engines covered
• Prompts and frequency for the price
• Acting on gaps (content, fixes)
• Seats, agencies and API
• Public price and contract
• Trial, refunds and support

Excellent = 9–10, Strong = 7–8, Fair = 5–6, Limited = 0–4. Ratings are based on the verified facts on this page (prices, limits, terms and features from vendor pages, ratings from Trustpilot, G2 and OMR Reviews) and our hands-on use where marked in “How we compared”.

No free tool tracks 50 prompts every day. But Qwairy has a free plan, and Google and Bing now report AI visibility for your own site at no cost.

1. 01

   Export within 30 days

   Peec’s terms let you export your data during the subscription and for 30 days after it ends; then the data is deleted. Export prompts, answers, sources and share of voice to CSV first.

2. 02

   Check your renewal terms

   Monthly plans end at the close of the billing cycle (cancel in the Stripe page linked from Peec). Yearly plans renew for 12 months unless you give written notice at least 30 days before the end; an emailed notice is enough.

3. 03

   Refund rules differ more than prices

   Rankfender

   14 days, full, from your first payment

   Writesonic

   7 days, no questions asked

   Semrush

   7 days, annual plans only

   Ahrefs

   Only if unused (monthly plans)

   Peec AI, Otterly.AI, SE Visible, Geoptie, AthenaHQ, Profound

   Non-refundable

   Qwairy, Scrunch, Meteoria

   No refund clause found

4. 04

   Count engines, not plans

   Peec counts 3 models per plan; Geoptie 4 per brand; SE Visible 5; Qwairy and AthenaHQ meter every engine from one credit pool. Claude is Enterprise-only on Peec, an add-on on Otterly.AI, Agency-only on SE Visible. Rankfender tracks 8 LLMs, Claude included, plus Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode for tracked keywords, weekly (daily on Business).

5. 05

   Countries count per project

   Peec allows 1 country per project on Starter and 3 on Pro and Advanced. On SE Visible and Geoptie each extra country counts as another prompt. Price the markets you report on.

6. 06

   Convert plans into answers a month

   Peec Starter: 50 prompts × 3 models × 30 days = 4,500 answers. Otterly.AI Lite: 1,800. Scrunch Core: 5,000. SE Visible Basic: about 11,250. Geoptie Professional: 100 × 4 × 30 = 12,000.

7. 07

   Results won’t match exactly

   Tools mix scraping and APIs, and answers vary run to run. Track the same 20 prompts in both tools for two weeks and compare trends, not single numbers.

1. 01

   Export

   Prompts, answers, sources and share of voice to CSV, before you cancel; you have 30 days after the end.

2. 02

   Record your baseline

   Visibility and share of voice for your 20 most important prompts, model by model.

3. 03

   Cancel on time

   Monthly: in the Stripe page before the cycle ends. Yearly: email notice at least 30 days before the term ends.

4. 04

   Rebuild your prompts

   Re-add your own prompts and countries; check which engines your new plan covers.

5. 05

   Run both for two weeks

   Compare trends on the same prompts, then switch your reporting over.

Getmint vs Peec AI

Getmint (Yoma Studio SAS, near Paris) publishes no price: its Advanced plan is sold on a call, with a 12-month commitment, 300+ prompts daily, 1 brand, unlimited users and 10 pieces of content a month. Peec is self-serve and monthly from $95. Pick Getmint for content help, Peec for a price you can see.

German-language and smaller European markets

Peec is a Berlin company, rated 4.8 from 18 reviews on OMR, Germany’s B2B review site; one reviewer notes limited coverage outside DACH. Countries are 1 per project on Starter, 3 on Pro. Qwairy (Paris) tracks 240+ countries and 45+ languages on every plan.

A French alternative billed in euros (Meteoria)

Meteoria (Saint-Mandé) is €75 a month ($83.50 at the ECB rate of 28 Oct 2026) for 25 prompts daily in 3 of 7 engines, with unlimited seats, projects and countries and a 7-day trial. No Claude; whether VAT is included isn’t stated.

Peec AI for agencies

Peec’s agency plans are $245, $495 and $795 a month for 10,000, 25,000 and 65,000 credits (1 prompt × 1 model × 1 day = 1 credit), with 3, 10 and 25 projects, API and unlimited client users. Claude needs Scale ($795). Geoptie Business ($249) and SE Visible Agency ($399) cost less.

Peec AI vs Profound

Peec has public prices from $95 and unlimited users. Profound sells brands only a free trial or an Enterprise quote, with prompt volumes and crawler logs. Many pages, Peec’s own comparison page included, still quote Profound’s gone $99 plan. See Profound alternatives.

Peec AI vs AthenaHQ

Peec: 50 prompts daily in 3 models for $95, unlimited users. AthenaHQ: 11 engines on Starter ($295) but credits, so 3 prompts daily in all 11, and a free plan. Many prompts in few engines → Peec; few prompts in many engines → AthenaHQ. See AthenaHQ alternatives.

Peec AI vs Otterly.AI

Otterly.AI starts at $29 for 15 prompts daily in 4 engines, Perplexity included, and sells Claude, Gemini and AI Mode as add-ons. Peec’s $95 buys 50 prompts in 3 engines. Both have unlimited users. See Otterly.AI alternatives.

Already on Semrush or Ahrefs

Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit is $99 a month per domain (25 prompts daily, +$99 per user, no trial). Ahrefs prompt packs start at $50 on top of Lite, Claude included. See Semrush alternatives and Ahrefs alternatives.

• Prices and limits: read on each vendor’s own pricing, help and terms pages on 28 October 2026, from a US connection, in US dollars. Peec’s yearly and add-on prices come from its pricing page code and screenshots; contract terms from its Master Customer Agreement (22 Oct 2026); agency prices from its agency pricing page.
• Price history: Peec’s pricing page in the Wayback Machine, April 2025 to October 2026 (47 captures); company facts from Peec’s own press release (May 2026), tech.eu (Series A, Nov 2025) and its imprint.
• Currency: Peec shows dollars or euros depending on your IP address; we used the dollar view from a US connection. Meteoria shows euros only: converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Oct 2026 (€1 = $1.1133). Qwairy shows its own dollar prices to US visitors.
• Ratings: Trustpilot and OMR Reviews pages read the same day; G2 figures as listed in G2 search results (G2 blocks automated reading). Reddit could not be read on build day, so no Reddit comment is quoted. Quotes from German reviews are translated and marked.
• Search data: Rankfender’s own data, 30 Jul – 28 Oct 2026 (15 queries containing “peec”, 47 impressions across rankfender.com). US results for seven Peec AI queries read on 28 Oct 2026; 14 ranking pages audited.
• AI answers: 93 answers from 8 assistants stored by Rankfender between March and October 2026, to questions asking for an AI-visibility tool or platform that named no tool and weren’t about agencies (in English, Portuguese and French). Each tool counted once per answer, by name. Counts only; no customer or question is shown.
• Hands-on vs not: we use Rankfender daily; its screenshots, and the Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools reports, come from our own accounts. We did not run a paid account of the other tools: their features come from official pages and documentation, and the screenshots from their public pricing pages on 27–28 Oct 2026.
• Updates: we re-check prices every 30 days and change the date above when anything moves.